- Charlie Arnold
It will be, but this is a high-stakes game, on two fronts:
1) We're putting ourselves in a position to be targeted by smart, technologically capable, mean-spirited people who would like to hurt us
2) Word about what we think and say is getting out to ENL influencers who might have a lot to lose if they get exposed doing Bad Shit.
So, it's a predictable phase change. Consider where you sit with that and proceed accordingly.
- Michael Noda [GreatNorthern, PHL πΊπΈ] Back in the Bad Old Days of the 1960s and 1970s, the United States asserted that all norms and treaties about nuclear non-proliferation were dead letters if there was ever a general war in Europe. If the Soviets came through the Fulda Gap, we were handing dozens of nukes each to about ten different countries.
- Michael Noda [GreatNorthern, PHL πΊπΈ] Anyway, I am sitting in a room of 40 people who have all just been handed nuclear weapons. People are starting to have panic reactions. Anyone who hasn't found a mole in here to tell them what's going on is incompetent. 40 person rooms are inherently insecure.
- Cate [Intoku, WA, πΊπΈ]
I haven't seen any reason to think someone in here is actively leaking. I'm sure some things are being talked about. I'm sure other people in other places are having reactions. But EWBF
.....21.10.2017 00:59:31, Michael Noda [GreatNorthern, PHL <span class="emoji emoji-spritesheet-3" style="background-position: -486px -36px;" title="us">:us:</span>]: >>left group<<
- SeaFoamSoul SAS I didn't mean as a group though. We've got a range of opinions in here for which tools are okay and which are not, as well as what the reporting threshold is or should be. If you're an anomaly operator with access to anomaly tools, and you want to preserve that connection, maybe it would be worthwhile approaching the dev(s) to explain your position.
- Charlie Arnold
My honest read is that if you're an anomaly operator with access to anomaly tools, you should probably get outta here if you have a commitment to preserving that privilege.
We have a deep, hard culture of rigidly protecting the sanctity of tools. The position I've taken on that sort of thing is going to rub off on everyone, and the paranoia wave is going to spread fast.
- Rebecca S (PoisonIvy30)
Whether we want to preserve that or not is past being an issue. It is apparently already known that I'm here so leaving doesn't do any good. I simply wish that whoever felt the need to say anything outside of here would've had the decency to stand up.
If I thought anomaly tools were needing reported, I wouldn't be an anomaly op. Period.
- StealthRanger [St. Louis, MO, USA]
Well, I feel like we accomplished what we initially set out to do; expose a worldwide resistance cheating syndicate.
I have never been aware of any of these enlightened tools that people are saying cross the line. Heck, I didn't even know their names until people typed them here. Since I'm not in any of those places, and have no information about them, I won't be helpful in that phase of this campaign if that's where it's headed.
I've never used a tool I felt was sketchy. All the anomaly tools are above board and not in question. I feel absolutely comfortable using them, and would never betray the trust shared with me by fellow operators and tool developers by sharing those tools outside of the appropriate groups.