- How do I get back into the website?

- click link in emial is what i do

- but its

- brokersguild.wordpress.com

- once registerested just go to that link

- Just woke back up. Took brief nap on ferry

- Missed 100+ messages

- My head is going to explode

- dont read them

- its all just minor edits to the website

- like buttons removed

- share buttons limited to telegram and G+

- Oh God bless you

- When this goes live, there will be a pin here to alert us, yes?

- All the links seem to be working. I like that the images are all galleries now.

- Yes, can you remind me what our marching orders are at release time?

- New posts on G+, in your own words. Link to it.

- @theprevaricator we need to censor the agent name in the first photo of riot.one page.

- riot one

- The Digest.

- we've generally not been censoring names

- why?

- WB asked

- In the web address?

- yes

- Cjohn32

- the cjohn32

- ahh

- That's an ENL agent right?

- pretty sure yes

- This^^

- and is identifable to them to who the leaker can be

- right, it could be used to idenify WB but isnt WB

- Correct

- Or an alt ;)

- On the riot.one page, should we expand on "Accessing the GUID requires scanner emulation" a little bit? People may see that and wonder what it means. Even just a simple parenthetical thing like "(using a computer to simulate the scanner interface)" ... Thoughts?

- Or using a phone with spoofing software and a broken version of Ingress.

- Getting into those details seems bad.

- Because that immediately starts to scratch the surface of using a computer to act as a scanner and slips right down to spoofing

- Do we want to put the link to the site on our g+ posts too? And tag tf out of anyone can

- Yea.

- @Semiotiq ☝️☝️

- Perhaps just leave it as "simulating a legitimate scanner" ?

- That works

- I will keep myself out of being directly being involved in the initial planning of this in my post. More something like "so, I was sent this link to this site and..."

- 1h59m until go time

- Yes, I think the more we say "Hey, look what I saw today" the more anonymous this group remains.

- I dont believe that there will be primarily G+ post

- the primary source is the wordpress

- everyone can just share like they were linked it

- IIRC it will be an anon reddit post to get it out to the world then the rest of us can boost it from there.

- and we are sharing in our local slacks? Did I see Charlie talk about that last night?

- I dont think this is happening anymore

- 1,594 people has not broken OPsec yet.

- I'm on that

- hit counter is borked a bit

- Those are individual views, I think. They'd have to be

- im ok with it being higher

- i know haha just makig a funny

- Yes, share in local slack, but just as important is to convince others who are not in this group to post on G+ where Niantic can see it. (paraphrase of what Charlie said)

- I'd really like to get this to our core high OPSEC locals so they can be prepared to signal boost as well... maybe 15-30 minutes prior to release but waiting for guidance on that.

- the thing is

- release is when i turn off private viewing

- so if we make it linkable at all

- its worldwide

- and then bets are off

- for some reason it it asking me to request another invite ugh

- On wordpress.com, right? But someone would have to come across it or find it in a google search after indexing.

- It did that to me too

- well, ppl will also start sharing as soon as its possible

- because they are ppl

- True - so embargo until the reddit post is made, imo.

- it takes 3-5 minutes for someone to read this and go holy fuck and then want to tell everyone

- then they come back

- and read more

- I already have a time line in mind for where I share it and when.

- Is the URL for linking going to be the WordPress url, or are we doing a tinyurl?

- if someone has a good name for tinyurl

- im ok with it

- I would suggest sending via DMs to people you know will care as well as posting publicly... Just a "holy shit did you see this?" kind of thing

- otherwise wordpress

- Do you think the Whistleblower would be willing to show all the data for an agent? Utilizing the website API so that he wouldn't be noticed by anybody? I would be willing to be the guinea pig

- heh I still think thebrokersguild.party or thebrokersguild.wtf would be funny.

- did someone say cleangress as a tinyurl?

- Lol

- scraper.party

- not wtf lol

- ☝️

- heh oh yeah, sorry. :)

- [[Document, size 101'662 bytes]]

- The trolling opportunities in the tiny urls is SO GOOD

- cleaningress

- we are stuck unportmanteaud

- ooohh you guys are on a different dimension

- i like these ideas

- can you change that still?

- fuck

- i still have the screen up but it wont change anything

- Just do a new one